"Great location
" |
|
|
|
Review by: Mr G Harmon of Belfast (Mature couple) stayed in Ramada New Yorker Oct 2008
|
"Great location, we went to a concert at Madison Sq Gardens
" |
|
"Good location, right next to subway 34th Street, very close to Macy's,
walkable to Times Square. Rooms not a bad size, enough space, great
shower, noisy aircon, bathrooms dated, carpets bit worn, but all clean
and beds very comfortable.
"
The best thing about Ramada New Yorker was:"Location
"
The worst thing about Ramada New Yorker was: "Bit dated and shabby in places, hallways need updating
"
|
|
Review by: Miss N Meldrum of . (Young adult friends) stayed in Ramada New Yorker Aug 2007
|
|
|
"Hotel was in great location good value the renovations are badly needed
we had a fantastic time thanks
"
The best thing about Ramada New Yorker was:"Location
"
The worst thing about Ramada New Yorker was: "Needs the planned renovations
"
|
|
Review by: Mrs K Richardson of Tamworth (Mature couple) stayed in Ramada New Yorker May 2007
|
"Great location, friendly staff,
" |
|
"Could not have had a better location,room with a view of empire state
building. Must say the room was very small though& the planned
renovationof the hotel is needed.Staff were very helpful and friendlyand
we enjoyed our stay very much.Great for the train back to the airport,
no holdups!
"
The best thing about Ramada New Yorker was:"Location
"
The worst thing about Ramada New Yorker was: "Size of rooms
"
|
|
Review by: Mrs P Carter of Hull (Mature couple) stayed in Ramada New Yorker Mar 2007
|
|
|
"Excellent location,no fuss but a little tired. "
The best thing about Ramada New Yorker was:"Location"
The worst thing about Ramada New Yorker was: "Decoration"
|
|
Review by: Mrs M Burn of Bedlington (Mature couple) stayed in Ramada New Yorker Oct 2006
|
"Centrally located" |
|
"The Ramada New Yorker was centrally located and good value. The rooms
were a little small, but sufficient. Found the air conditioning unit a
bit loud also. The dining facilites were good and the breakfast was
massive! "
The best thing about Ramada New Yorker was:"Good location"
The worst thing about Ramada New Yorker was: "Small Rooms"
|
|
Review by: Ms C O'Hara of Sligo (Young couple) stayed in Ramada New Yorker Oct 2005
|
"Excellent base for exploring New York" |
|
"Rooms clean and functional. Not large by todays standards but adequate.
Breakfast room on the 26th floor very small and basic but good views.
Diner on ground floor great value.
Staff were great even under
pressure (busy July 4th time).
Left an expensive watch on a counter
which I collected a week later on my return from a cruise."
The best thing about Ramada New Yorker was:"The diner and location"
The worst thing about Ramada New Yorker was: "Somewhat threadbare linen and furnishings."
|
|
Review by: Mr J Mcelroy of Westhill (Mature couple) stayed in Ramada New Yorker Jul 2005
|